PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than INTL.L's 20.93% return.


AINF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.37%
6M
29.00%
YTD
38.00%
1Y
67.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.54%

INTL.L

1D
-2.36%
1M
-15.96%
6M
13.00%
YTD
20.93%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£1.05M£1.47M£2.79M
£10.66K£11.90K£17.61K

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and INTL.L is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.92

The correlation between AINF.L and INTL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AINF.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.81

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

5.89

-1.81

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-37.71%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.48%

-19.65%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-19.65%

+4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-12.27%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.41%

6.04%

+10.37%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) is 9.56%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that AINF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

11.90%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

24.00%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.63%

29.42%

+21.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.54%

29.60%

+13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.54%

29.48%

+14.06%

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AINF.L and INTL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AINF.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

AINF.L tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Net Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer