PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while EMVL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 10.41% return.


AINF.L

1D
0.26%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
8.62%
1Y
54.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMVL.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
-9.92%
YTD
10.41%
6M
22.50%
1Y
46.41%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.46

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

3.01

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

4.69

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.14

14.09

-0.96

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and EMVL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.46

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.63

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and EMVL.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.L nor EMVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than EMVL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and EMVL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-34.95%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-12.92%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-11.65%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-10.19%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.39%

+0.50%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) is 6.62%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that AINF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

8.94%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

14.54%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.38%

18.70%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.75%

17.90%

+7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.75%

20.50%

+5.25%