AINF.L vs. EMVL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L).
AINF.L and EMVL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AINF.L is managed by iShares. EMVL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018.
Performance
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -1.18% | 34.74% | 0.43% |
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 10.41% | 32.93% | -0.76% |
Different Trading Currencies
AINF.L is traded in GBP, while EMVL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 10.41% return.
AINF.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 54.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMVL.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
AINF.L
EMVL.L
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINF.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 3.01 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 4.69 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 14.09 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINF.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.63 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between AINF.L and EMVL.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AINF.L nor EMVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than EMVL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and EMVL.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINF.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -34.95% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -12.92% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.70% | -11.65% | +3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -10.19% | +4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.39% | +0.50% |
Volatility
AINF.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) is 6.62%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that AINF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AINF.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 8.94% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.68% | 14.54% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 18.70% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 17.90% | +7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 20.50% | +5.25% |