PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.AS is traded in USD, while WTI2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WTI2.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 41.52% return, which is significantly higher than WTI2.DE's 29.42% return.


AINF.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.34%
6M
35.04%
YTD
41.52%
1Y
75.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
55.59%

WTI2.DE

1D
2.38%
1M
-11.91%
6M
24.80%
YTD
29.42%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
41.52%43.70%0.17%
WTI2.DE
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
29.42%23.86%-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and WTI2.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.87

The correlation between AINF.AS and WTI2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

WTI2.DE
WTI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AINF.ASWTI2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

3.20

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.76

8.93

+8.83

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and WTI2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum WTI2.DE drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and WTI2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.ASWTI2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-47.89%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-15.55%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.67%

-13.54%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-13.72%

+9.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

5.58%

-1.39%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) is 9.93%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that AINF.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTI2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.ASWTI2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

12.41%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.71%

24.24%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

30.30%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.94%

28.39%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

28.58%

+0.36%

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WTI2.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.AS vs. WTI2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.AS nor WTI2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AINF.AS and WTI2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AINF.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WTI2.DE.

AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while WTI2.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.40% for WTI2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and WTI2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer