PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AINF.AS (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WINC.AS (iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both exchange-traded funds - AINF.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while WINC.AS is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by iShares. AINF.AS is passively managed, while WINC.AS is actively managed. Over the past year, AINF.AS returned 124.11% vs 25.00% for WINC.AS. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly higher than WINC.AS's 8.19% return.

AINF.AS

1D
0.12%
1M
27.63%
YTD
60.14%
6M
61.51%
1Y
124.11%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

WINC.AS

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.21%
YTD
8.19%
6M
9.90%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		60.14%44.70%-1.33%
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc		8.19%21.56%-3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and WINC.AS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.69

The correlation between AINF.AS and WINC.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc

Often compared with AINF.AS:
AINF.AS vs. ROBO.ASAINF.AS vs. XAID.LAINF.AS vs. SKYE.ASAINF.AS vs. IMAE.ASAINF.AS vs. EUEA.ASAINF.AS vs. IDVY.ASAINF.AS vs. CSPX.AS
Often compared with WINC.AS:
WINC.AS vs. JEPQWINC.AS vs. JEPG.LWINC.AS vs. JEQP.LWINC.AS vs. VWRL.ASWINC.AS vs. SWDA.LWINC.AS vs. TDGB.LWINC.AS vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
WINC.AS
WINC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AINF.ASWINC.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.96
2.35

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.67
3.54

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.43

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.36

3.68

+6.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.07

15.56

+18.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and WINC.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AINF.ASWINC.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

2.35

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.67

1.58

+1.09

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, which is greater than WINC.AS's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and WINC.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AINF.ASWINC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-14.81%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-6.77%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.98%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-1.54%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.60%

+2.00%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) at 3.10%. This indicates that AINF.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AINF.ASWINC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

3.10%

+6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.09%

8.24%

+10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.60%

10.58%

+14.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

13.85%

+14.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.91%

13.85%

+14.06%

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AINF.AS and WINC.AS have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

AINF.AS vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison

AINF.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%.

PositionTTM20252024
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc		9.70%9.38%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

AINF.AS and WINC.AS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS and WINC.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

AINF.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while WINC.AS is Global Equity Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and WINC.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer