PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.AS is traded in USD, while QUTM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QUTM.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly higher than QUTM.DE's 34.24% return.


AINF.AS

1D
0.12%
1M
27.63%
YTD
60.14%
6M
61.51%
1Y
124.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QUTM.DE

1D
-2.21%
1M
20.86%
YTD
34.24%
6M
35.91%
1Y
64.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and QUTM.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025

0.68

The correlation between AINF.AS and QUTM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.ASQUTM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.35

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.36

2.65

+7.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.07

6.44

+27.63

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and QUTM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.ASQUTM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

2.12

+2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.67

1.87

+0.80

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and QUTM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.ASQUTM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-24.36%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-24.36%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.21%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-7.59%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

10.04%

-6.44%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) is 9.59%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that AINF.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.ASQUTM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

12.61%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.09%

21.53%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.60%

30.43%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

30.43%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.91%

30.43%

-2.52%

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.AS vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.AS nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.AS and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINF.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and QUTM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer