AINF.AS vs. AIS
AINF.AS (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AINF.AS is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, AINF.AS returned 124.11% vs 226.72% for AIS. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AINF.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.
Performance
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.
AINF.AS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 60.14%
- 6M
- 61.51%
- 1Y
- 124.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 35.87%
- YTD
- 118.61%
- 6M
- 122.65%
- 1Y
- 226.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AINF.AS iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 60.14% | 44.70% | -1.33% |
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 118.61% | 58.35% | -5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between AINF.AS and AIS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between AINF.AS and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AINF.AS vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank
AINF.AS
AIS
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINF.AS | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.80 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.36 | 14.41 | -4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.07 | 47.43 | -13.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINF.AS | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96 | 6.34 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.67 | 3.24 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and AIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINF.AS | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.26% | -32.78% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -15.84% | +4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -5.45% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 4.80% | -1.20% |
Volatility
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) is 9.59%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that AINF.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AINF.AS | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 16.12% | -6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.09% | 29.95% | -10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.60% | 36.00% | -11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 38.04% | -10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 38.04% | -10.13% |
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AINF.AS vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AINF.AS nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AINF.AS and AIS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AINF.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AINF.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.75% for AIS.
Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and AIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer