AIIFX vs. CGHIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIIFX (Timber Point Alternative Income Fund) and CGHIX (Timber Point Global Allocations Fund) are both mutual funds - AIIFX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Crow Point, while CGHIX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Crow Point. Over the past 5 years, AIIFX returned 1.27%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for CGHIX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIIFX charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for CGHIX.

Performance

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timber Point Alternative Income Fund (AIIFX) and Timber Point Global Allocations Fund (CGHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIIFX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than CGHIX's 7.20% return.

AIIFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: —

CGHIX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 2.00%
• 10Y*: 4.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIIFX Timber Point Alternative Income Fund	0.86%	5.78%	2.58%	8.33%	-11.73%	2.48%	0.56%	4.99%
CGHIX Timber Point Global Allocations Fund	7.20%	11.96%	8.37%	9.87%	-23.04%	5.03%	7.61%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AIIFX and CGHIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2019	0.69

The correlation between AIIFX and CGHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AIIFX vs. CGHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIIFX

AIIFX Risk / Return Rank: 16
AIIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AIIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AIIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AIIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
AIIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CGHIX

CGHIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
CGHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CGHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CGHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CGHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CGHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timber Point Alternative Income Fund (AIIFX) and Timber Point Global Allocations Fund (CGHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIIFX	CGHIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.49	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.13	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.27	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.86	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	7.16	-1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the CGHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIIFX and CGHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIIFX	CGHIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.49	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.14	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.26	+0.04

Drawdowns

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIIFX drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum CGHIX drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIIFX and CGHIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIIFX	CGHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-28.28%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.52%	-10.66%	+7.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.43%	-22.79%	+15.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.30%	-27.21%	+13.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.43%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-7.46%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	2.77%	-1.83%

Volatility

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timber Point Alternative Income Fund (AIIFX) is 1.27%, while Timber Point Global Allocations Fund (CGHIX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that AIIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIIFX	CGHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	3.91%	-2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.88%	10.48%	-6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.00%	13.29%	-8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.90%	14.08%	-8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.90%	13.24%	-7.34%

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIIFX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHIX's 1.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIIFX vs. CGHIX - Dividend Comparison

AIIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than CGHIX's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIIFX Timber Point Alternative Income Fund	3.67%	3.70%	0.00%	2.31%	2.52%	1.76%	2.34%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGHIX Timber Point Global Allocations Fund	0.23%	0.25%	0.00%	0.68%	1.10%	0.00%	0.60%	0.95%	0.92%	2.86%	7.52%	8.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIIFX and CGHIX in my portfolio?

AIIFX and CGHIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIIFX or CGHIX?

CGHIX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to AIIFX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIIFX dropped -15.31% vs CGHIX's -28.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.