AIGOX vs. TANDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX).
AIGOX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 15, 1988. TANDX is managed by Castle Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 15, 2019.
Performance
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGOX Alger Growth & Income Portfolio | -4.34% | 19.79% | 23.07% | 23.62% | -15.15% | 31.82% | 14.86% | 18.20% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -9.28% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 13.39% | 12.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGOX achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -9.28% return.
AIGOX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -4.34%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
TANDX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -9.28%
- 6M
- -10.00%
- 1Y
- -10.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGOX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIGOX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
AIGOX
TANDX
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGOX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | -0.81 | +1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | -1.07 | +2.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.86 | +0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | -0.79 | +2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | -2.33 | +9.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGOX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | -0.81 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.00 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.01 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGOX and TANDX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
AIGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.36%, more than TANDX's 6.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGOX Alger Growth & Income Portfolio | 14.36% | 13.51% | 1.23% | 4.06% | 8.76% | 8.32% | 1.66% | 10.86% | 8.44% | 1.42% | 1.17% | 1.72% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 6.80% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGOX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -95.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGOX and TANDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGOX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.78% | -95.17% | +31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -13.14% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.30% | -95.17% | +71.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.11% | -95.13% | +87.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -18.89% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 4.43% | -1.97% |
Volatility
AIGOX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 3.00%. This indicates that AIGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIGOX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 3.00% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 7.28% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 12.04% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 1,010.25% | -993.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 852.68% | -834.72% |