PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGOX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGOX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 4.35% return.


AIGOX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
11.69%
6M
10.43%
1Y
29.77%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
15.78%

NWAUX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
4.35%
6M
4.20%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIGOX
Alger Growth & Income Portfolio
11.69%19.79%23.07%23.62%-15.15%28.45%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.35%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGOX and NWAUX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.66

The correlation between AIGOX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGOX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGOX
AIGOX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AIGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGOXNWAUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.04

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.23

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.32

0.58

+15.74

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGOX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGOX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGOX and NWAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGOXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.78%

-21.07%

-42.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-8.55%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-19.31%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-21.07%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-11.57%

+8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-6.97%

-8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.37%

-1.54%

Volatility

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 4.08%. This indicates that AIGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGOXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.08%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

8.10%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

10.51%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.14%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

15.91%

+2.12%

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGOX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGOX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

AIGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.17%, more than NWAUX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGOX
Alger Growth & Income Portfolio
12.17%13.51%1.23%4.06%8.76%8.32%1.66%10.86%8.44%1.42%1.17%1.72%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.99%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGOX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIGOX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to NWAUX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIGOX dropped -63.78% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

AIGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGOX and NWAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer