PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGOX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGOX achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGOX has outperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 15.24%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.13% annualized return.


AIGOX

1D
1.59%
1M
-0.23%
6M
10.74%
YTD
13.23%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
15.24%
ALL TIME*
7.27%

FSUVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
11.13%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGOX
Alger Growth & Income Portfolio
13.23%19.79%23.07%23.62%-15.15%31.82%14.86%29.48%-4.61%21.33%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
8.73%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%1.35%17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGOX and FSUVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between AIGOX and FSUVX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGOX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIGOX
AIGOX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGOXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.87

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

7.68

+5.64

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGOX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGOX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGOX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGOXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.78%

-32.41%

-31.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-7.28%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-11.55%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-19.48%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

-32.41%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.68%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-3.25%

-12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.77%

+0.12%

Volatility

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGOXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.36%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

7.10%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

9.00%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

13.00%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

15.19%

+2.84%

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGOX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGOX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

AIGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than FSUVX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGOX
Alger Growth & Income Portfolio
12.00%13.51%1.23%4.06%8.76%8.32%1.66%10.86%8.44%1.42%1.17%1.72%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.09%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGOX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIGOX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FSUVX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIGOX dropped -63.78% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

AIGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGOX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer