PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Grains (AIGG.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGG.L is traded in USD, while PHSP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHSP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AIGG.L having a 2.81% return and PHSP.L slightly lower at 2.72%. Over the past 10 years, AIGG.L has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of -3.19%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


AIGG.L

1D
-2.49%
1M
-8.79%
YTD
2.81%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
-1.19%
3Y*
-8.84%
5Y*
-5.09%
10Y*
-3.19%

PHSP.L

1D
0.51%
1M
0.17%
YTD
2.72%
6M
29.13%
1Y
113.20%
3Y*
45.44%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGG.L
WisdomTree Grains
2.81%-6.10%-17.98%-13.17%16.03%20.28%17.82%-2.93%-6.42%-11.59%
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
2.72%147.01%20.80%-1.58%3.15%-12.90%45.17%17.09%-9.01%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGG.L and PHSP.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.15

The correlation between AIGG.L and PHSP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGG.L
AIGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AIGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Grains (AIGG.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGG.LPHSP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.35

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

2.75

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

6.00

-6.20

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGG.L and PHSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGG.LPHSP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

2.03

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.60

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.51

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.27

-0.46

Drawdowns

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGG.L drawdown since its inception was -73.81%, roughly equal to the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -76.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGG.L and PHSP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGG.LPHSP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.81%

-76.98%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-40.88%

+29.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.60%

-40.88%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.45%

-40.88%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.40%

-43.76%

-4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.24%

-35.55%

-28.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-48.35%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

18.79%

-12.93%

Volatility

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Grains (AIGG.L) is 7.85%, while WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that AIGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGG.LPHSP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

17.02%

-9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

52.69%

-39.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

55.42%

-39.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

34.96%

-13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

30.52%

-11.10%

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIGG.L and PHSP.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

AIGG.L vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGG.L nor PHSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGG.L and PHSP.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGG.L and PHSP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

AIGG.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while PHSP.L is Silver. AIGG.L tracks Bloomberg Grains, while PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGG.L and PHSP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer