PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGC.L achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly higher than FAIG.L's 19.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGC.L has underperformed FAIG.L with an annualized return of 5.99%, while FAIG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.41% annualized return.


AIGC.L

1D
-1.47%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
24.32%
6M
24.87%
1Y
37.57%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
5.99%

FAIG.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
19.26%
6M
19.79%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGC.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities
24.32%16.03%2.05%-6.41%13.22%26.42%-3.80%7.16%-11.46%0.80%
FAIG.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated
19.26%15.92%4.08%-7.24%16.01%30.43%2.04%6.53%-9.43%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGC.L and FAIG.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, AIGC.L and FAIG.L have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.73, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGC.L
AIGC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AIGC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FAIG.L
FAIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FAIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FAIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGC.LFAIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

4.98

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

12.76

-0.69

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FAIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGC.L and FAIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGC.LFAIG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.28

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.70

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.08

-0.10

Drawdowns

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGC.L drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, which is greater than FAIG.L's maximum drawdown of -68.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGC.L and FAIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGC.LFAIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.92%

-68.50%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-6.30%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

-10.42%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-24.76%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

-30.94%

-3.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.42%

-14.57%

-22.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.02%

-44.38%

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.46%

+0.64%

Volatility

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L) at 4.70%. This indicates that AIGC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGC.LFAIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

4.70%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

11.58%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

13.79%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

15.39%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

13.53%

+2.23%

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIGC.L and FAIG.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

AIGC.L vs. FAIG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGC.L nor FAIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AIGC.L and FAIG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGC.L and FAIG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

AIGC.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while FAIG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGC.L and FAIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer