AIGA.L vs. NATO
AIGA.L (WisdomTree Agriculture) and NATO (Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGA.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Agriculture, while NATO is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIGA.L returned -1.48% vs 19.28% for NATO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AIGA.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NATO.
Performance
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGA.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than NATO's 5.66% return.
AIGA.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- -5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 0.02%
NATO
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 19.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 2.04% | -2.00% | -0.00% |
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 5.66% | 50.95% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGA.L and NATO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGA.L vs. NATO — Risk / Return Rank
AIGA.L
NATO
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIGA.L | NATO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.21 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 2.99 | -3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGA.L drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than NATO's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGA.L and NATO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGA.L | NATO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -15.99% | -51.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -15.99% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.36% | -8.61% | -34.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.31% | -3.84% | -37.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 6.46% | -1.89% |
Volatility
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) is 4.48%, while Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that AIGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGA.L | NATO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 8.59% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 18.36% | -8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 21.45% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 22.80% | -6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 22.80% | +5.50% |
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGA.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGA.L vs. NATO - Dividend Comparison
AIGA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGA.L and NATO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NATO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NATO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGA.L.
AIGA.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while NATO is Aerospace & Defense. AIGA.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture, while NATO tracks Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGA.L and 0.35% for NATO.
Find the right allocation for AIGA.L and NATO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer