PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFRX vs. RGIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFRX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than RGIYX's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has outperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.


AIFRX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.51%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.19%

RGIYX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
8.12%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
11.40%26.92%2.88%13.10%-7.95%15.61%1.87%28.41%-9.31%25.24%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.12%20.07%9.96%6.94%-2.95%12.44%-3.37%27.98%-9.87%18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFRX and RGIYX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.89

The correlation between AIFRX and RGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFRX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFRX
AIFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RGIYX
RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIFRXRGIYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.31

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

7.80

+3.80

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the RGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFRX and RGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIFRXRGIYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.39

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.51

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.52

+0.19

Drawdowns

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, roughly equal to the maximum RGIYX drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and RGIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFRXRGIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-39.17%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-6.00%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-13.74%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-20.19%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-39.17%

+0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-4.07%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-4.68%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.77%

-0.05%

Volatility

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFRXRGIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.48%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

8.15%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

10.00%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

13.57%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

15.93%

-0.06%

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIFRX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison

AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than RGIYX's 8.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
7.05%7.80%8.13%3.46%4.86%5.31%3.45%4.01%3.96%3.80%4.37%4.55%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.84%9.39%5.64%2.76%3.46%17.26%7.80%15.89%9.20%11.32%6.70%5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AIFRX and RGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RGIYX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to AIFRX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFRX dropped -38.38% vs RGIYX's -39.17%.

AIFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFRX and RGIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer