PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFRX vs. ATOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFRX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than ATOIX's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has outperformed ATOIX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while ATOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


AIFRX

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
11.91%
6M
12.14%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.24%

ATOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
11.91%26.92%2.88%13.10%-7.95%15.61%1.87%28.41%-9.31%25.24%
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
1.01%3.33%3.14%3.27%0.87%-0.04%0.88%1.40%1.54%2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFRX and ATOIX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFRX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFRX
AIFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ATOIX
ATOIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ATOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ATOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIFRXATOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-14.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

10.98

-9.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

30.48

-27.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

89.66

-77.76

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the ATOIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFRX and ATOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIFRXATOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

3.50

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

2.80

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

2.28

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

2.47

-1.76

Drawdowns

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and ATOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFRXATOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-1.46%

-36.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-0.10%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-0.10%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-0.37%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-0.43%

-37.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

0.00%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-0.06%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.03%

+1.68%

Volatility

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that AIFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFRXATOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

0.20%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

0.61%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

0.87%

+9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

0.83%

+13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

0.79%

+15.08%

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIFRX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison

AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
7.02%7.80%8.13%3.46%4.86%5.31%3.45%4.01%3.96%3.80%4.37%4.55%
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
2.98%3.27%3.09%3.02%1.07%0.06%0.88%1.39%1.42%2.20%0.61%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFRX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIFRX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFRX dropped -38.38% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.

ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFRX and ATOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer