PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFRX vs. AHYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFRX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than AHYMX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has outperformed AHYMX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while AHYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.56% annualized return.


AIFRX

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
11.91%
6M
12.14%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.24%

AHYMX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
11.91%26.92%2.88%13.10%-7.95%15.61%1.87%28.41%-9.31%25.24%
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
1.18%2.91%4.07%1.56%-9.36%4.06%1.81%5.23%1.50%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFRX and AHYMX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.11

The correlation between AIFRX and AHYMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFRX vs. AHYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFRX
AIFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYMX
AHYMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AHYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIFRXAHYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.72

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

9.73

+2.18

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the AHYMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFRX and AHYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIFRXAHYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.03

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.08

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.60

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.96

-0.25

Drawdowns

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than AHYMX's maximum drawdown of -11.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and AHYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFRXAHYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-11.53%

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-1.98%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-4.53%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-11.53%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-11.53%

-26.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.42%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-2.49%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.55%

+1.16%

Volatility

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) at 1.15%. This indicates that AIFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFRXAHYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

1.15%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

1.94%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

2.68%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

2.93%

+11.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

2.61%

+13.26%

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYMX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIFRX vs. AHYMX - Dividend Comparison

AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than AHYMX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
4.56%4.52%3.32%2.21%2.05%2.31%2.74%3.10%3.39%2.82%3.28%3.43%
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
7.02%7.80%8.13%3.46%4.86%5.31%3.45%4.01%3.96%3.80%4.37%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFRX and AHYMX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIFRX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to AHYMX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFRX dropped -38.38% vs AHYMX's -11.53%.

AHYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFRX and AHYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer