AIFF vs. LUNR

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AIFF (Firefly Neuroscience, Inc.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines, Inc.) are both stocks. AIFF operates in Software - Application (Technology), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, AIFF returned -49.12%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AIFF vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFF achieves a 31.43% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's -16.70% return.

AIFF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -20.14%
• 6M: 11.65%
• YTD: 31.43%
• 1Y: -61.79%
• 3Y*: -49.12%
• 5Y*: -57.90%
• 10Y*: -12.15%

LUNR

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -40.49%
• 6M: -37.35%
• YTD: -16.70%
• 1Y: 10.37%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFF vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AIFF Firefly Neuroscience, Inc.	31.43%	-66.98%	-47.73%	-64.78%	-90.31%	57.64%
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.	-16.70%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFF and LUNR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.17

The correlation between AIFF and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AIFF : $17.95M LUNR : $2.15B
EPS AIFF : -$0.62 LUNR : -$0.00
PS Ratio AIFF : 10.46 LUNR : 2.00K
Total Revenue (TTM) AIFF : $1.58M LUNR : $334.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) AIFF : $823.00K LUNR : $85.92M
EBITDA (TTM) AIFF : -$8.73M LUNR : -$96.76M

Return for Risk

AIFF vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFF

AIFF Risk / Return Rank: 28
AIFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
AIFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AIFF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AIFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AIFF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 52
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFF vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIFF	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	0.09	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.01	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.11	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	0.15	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	0.38	-1.74

AIFF vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFF and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIFF vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFF drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFF and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIFF	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.64%	-97.43%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.08%	-70.59%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.33%	-76.91%	-19.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.34%	-83.51%	-15.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.39%	-63.48%	+13.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.59%	27.02%	+18.57%

Volatility

AIFF vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) have volatilities of 19.06% and 18.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIFF	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.06%	18.77%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	138.36%	86.68%	+51.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	186.37%	112.42%	+73.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	175.20%	169.98%	+5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	153.50%	169.98%	-16.48%

Dividends

AIFF vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIFF nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIFF and LUNR in my portfolio?

AIFF and LUNR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIFF or LUNR?

AIFF has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to LUNR (18.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFF dropped -99.64% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.