PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFF vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIFF vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFF achieves a 50.86% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's 21.93% return.


AIFF

1D
5.60%
1M
-23.70%
YTD
50.86%
6M
22.22%
1Y
-54.79%
3Y*
-47.72%
5Y*
-57.02%
10Y*
-10.27%

LUNR

1D
5.83%
1M
-50.94%
YTD
21.93%
6M
29.77%
1Y
74.21%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFF vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIFF
Firefly Neuroscience, Inc.
50.86%-66.98%-47.73%-64.78%-90.31%57.64%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
21.93%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFF and LUNR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.17

The correlation between AIFF and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIFF:

$21.42M

LUNR:

$2.93T

EPS

AIFF:

-$0.64

LUNR:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

AIFF:

11.64

LUNR:

2.19K

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIFF:

$1.58M

LUNR:

$334.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIFF:

$823.00K

LUNR:

$85.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

AIFF:

-$8.73M

LUNR:

-$96.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFF vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFF
AIFF Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AIFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFF vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIFFLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

1.26

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

3.29

-4.51

AIFF vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFF and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIFF vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFF drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFF and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFFLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-97.43%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.81%

-59.08%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.33%

-78.09%

-18.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.25%

-75.86%

-23.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.21%

-63.29%

+13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.75%

22.65%

+22.10%

Volatility

AIFF vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) is 19.90%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 37.17%. This indicates that AIFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFFLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.90%

37.17%

-17.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

140.28%

87.79%

+52.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

186.44%

111.97%

+74.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

175.12%

170.80%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

153.81%

170.80%

-16.99%

Dividends

AIFF vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIFF nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AIFF vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
485.00K
186.73M
(AIFF) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFF and LUNR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (37.17%) compared to AIFF (19.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFF dropped -99.64% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFF and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer