PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIDYX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Advisor Class (AIDYX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIDYX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 0.09% return.


AIDYX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
1.98%
ALL TIME*
2.09%

FSMUX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.48%
6M
-0.03%
YTD
0.09%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIDYX
AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Advisor Class
0.35%5.18%2.94%5.13%-5.88%0.22%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
0.09%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AIDYX and FSMUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.78

The correlation between AIDYX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIDYX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIDYX
AIDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AIDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AIDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Advisor Class (AIDYX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIDYXFSMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.55

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.55

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

9.44

-3.41

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIDYX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIDYX drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIDYX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIDYXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-16.27%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-2.68%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.06%

-5.95%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.15%

-16.23%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-2.13%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-5.31%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.71%

-0.03%

Volatility

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Advisor Class (AIDYX) is 0.59%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that AIDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIDYXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.97%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

2.27%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

3.16%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.46%

4.64%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

4.60%

-1.89%

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIDYX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIDYX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

AIDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than FSMUX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIDYX
AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Advisor Class
3.19%3.70%3.70%2.70%2.06%1.84%2.22%2.70%2.22%2.05%2.01%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
3.05%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIDYX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMUX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to AIDYX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIDYX dropped -9.57% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

AIDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIDYX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer