PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAI.L vs. WTAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly lower than WTAI's 57.45% return.


AIAI.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
20.66%
YTD
42.35%
6M
40.34%
1Y
77.74%
3Y*
38.01%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*

WTAI

1D
-1.48%
1M
19.79%
YTD
57.45%
6M
56.30%
1Y
105.11%
3Y*
36.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.35%30.30%18.45%59.58%-40.29%-0.68%
WTAI
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund
57.45%34.83%6.53%46.32%-42.27%-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAI.L and WTAI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.66

The correlation between AIAI.L and WTAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIAI.L
WTAI

Technology

71.5%
71.6%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Financial Services

1.3%
3.8%

Industrials

1.1%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

AIAI.L
71.5%
WTAI
71.6%

Communication Services

AIAI.L
10.3%
WTAI
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AIAI.L
9.2%
WTAI
8.3%

Healthcare

AIAI.L
5.7%
WTAI

-

Financial Services

AIAI.L
1.3%
WTAI
3.8%

Industrials

AIAI.L
1.1%
WTAI
5.6%

Real Estate

AIAI.L
0.9%
WTAI

-

Basic Materials

AIAI.L

-

WTAI

-

Consumer Defensive

AIAI.L

-

WTAI
0.4%

Energy

AIAI.L

-

WTAI

-

Utilities

AIAI.L

-

WTAI
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIAI.L vs. WTAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAI.L
AIAI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WTAI
WTAI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
WTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAI.LWTAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.55

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

6.85

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

21.87

-7.26

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the WTAI Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAI.L and WTAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAI.LWTAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

3.72

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.50

+0.27

Drawdowns

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than WTAI's maximum drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and WTAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAI.LWTAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-45.92%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-15.42%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-31.83%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.36%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-19.79%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

4.82%

+0.63%

Volatility

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) have volatilities of 10.67% and 10.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAI.LWTAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

10.70%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

22.78%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

28.43%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

30.98%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

30.98%

-2.17%

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WTAI's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIAI.L vs. WTAI - Dividend Comparison

AIAI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTAI
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund
1.15%1.81%0.19%0.24%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIAI.L and WTAI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTAI is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTAI is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.

AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WTAI tracks WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.45% for WTAI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIAI.L and WTAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer