PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAI.L vs. USTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIAI.L is traded in USD, while USTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USTY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly higher than USTY.L's 0.42% return.


AIAI.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
18.80%
YTD
42.35%
6M
39.03%
1Y
75.99%
3Y*
38.01%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*

USTY.L

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.88%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.35%30.30%18.45%59.58%-40.29%9.81%68.60%3.43%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.42%7.65%1.64%3.84%-12.17%-1.76%7.78%2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAI.L and USTY.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2019

-0.12

The correlation between AIAI.L and USTY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to -0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAI.L
AIAI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAI.LUSTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.16

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

1.46

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

4.56

+10.04

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the USTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAI.L and USTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAI.LUSTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

0.94

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.04

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.26

+0.51

Drawdowns

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than USTY.L's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and USTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAI.LUSTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-18.61%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-3.42%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-5.11%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

-16.44%

-33.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-3.73%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-5.80%

-8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

1.09%

+4.36%

Volatility

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) at 1.73%. This indicates that AIAI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAI.LUSTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

1.73%

+8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

3.97%

+16.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

5.33%

+21.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

7.13%

+21.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

6.86%

+21.95%

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than USTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIAI.L vs. USTY.L - Dividend Comparison

AIAI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIAI.L and USTY.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.

AIAI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while USTY.L is Government Bonds. AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.05% for USTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIAI.L and USTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer