PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIAI.L is traded in USD, while ENGE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly higher than ENGE.L's 33.14% return.


AIAI.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
20.66%
YTD
42.35%
6M
40.34%
1Y
77.74%
3Y*
38.01%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*

ENGE.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
33.14%
6M
30.54%
1Y
56.86%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.35%30.30%18.45%59.58%-30.89%
ENGE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
33.14%29.19%-10.70%11.50%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAI.L and ENGE.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.18

The correlation between AIAI.L and ENGE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAI.L
AIAI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGE.L
ENGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAI.LENGE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

5.77

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

18.32

-3.71

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAI.L and ENGE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAI.LENGE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

2.54

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.69

+0.08

Drawdowns

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than ENGE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and ENGE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAI.LENGE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-24.19%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-9.81%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-23.33%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-5.80%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-6.42%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

3.10%

+2.35%

Volatility

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) at 8.27%. This indicates that AIAI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENGE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAI.LENGE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

8.27%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

19.10%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

22.34%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

24.32%

+4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

24.32%

+4.49%

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIAI.L vs. ENGE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIAI.L nor ENGE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIAI.L and ENGE.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.

AIAI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ENGE.L is Energy Equities. AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.18% for ENGE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIAI.L and ENGE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer