PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L) and iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIAG.L is traded in GBp, while 36BA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 36BA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAG.L achieves a 41.86% return, which is significantly higher than 36BA.DE's -1.49% return.


AIAG.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
21.21%
YTD
41.86%
6M
38.73%
1Y
78.49%
3Y*
34.00%
5Y*
19.24%
10Y*

36BA.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AIAG.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
41.86%21.44%20.57%50.58%-33.18%11.07%48.23%
36BA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-1.49%10.88%-4.17%3.34%-12.52%-9.39%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAG.L and 36BA.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAG.L
AIAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

36BA.DE
36BA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
36BA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L) and iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAG.L36BA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.16

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

1.33

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

3.15

+9.30

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the 36BA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAG.L and 36BA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAG.L36BA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

0.92

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

-0.17

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.12

+0.90

Drawdowns

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.56%, which is greater than 36BA.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAG.L and 36BA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAG.L36BA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.56%

-26.70%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-4.17%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.73%

-6.63%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.56%

-22.05%

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-15.11%

+13.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-15.78%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

1.76%

+4.53%

Volatility

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE) at 1.95%. This indicates that AIAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAG.L36BA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

1.95%

+7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.98%

4.33%

+14.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

6.04%

+19.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.58%

8.56%

+18.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

8.61%

+18.95%

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIAG.L vs. 36BA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AIAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36BA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
36BA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.95%4.73%4.75%4.15%2.94%1.76%0.87%
AIAG.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIAG.L and 36BA.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36BA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36BA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAG.L.

AIAG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while 36BA.DE is Corporate Bonds. AIAG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while 36BA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAG.L and 0.17% for 36BA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIAG.L and 36BA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer