PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIAA.DE
iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-8.41%5.44%-1.65%
XMOV.DE
Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF
1.38%14.79%0.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAA.DE achieves a -8.41% return, which is significantly lower than XMOV.DE's 1.38% return.


AIAA.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
-8.41%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMOV.DE

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
1.38%
6M
6.50%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIAA.DE and XMOV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAA.DE
AIAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XMOV.DE
XMOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAA.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.04

1.05

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

1.50

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.20

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.78

-2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.66

10.08

-8.41

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAA.DE and XMOV.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAA.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

1.05

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.61

-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between AIAA.DE and XMOV.DE is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIAA.DE nor XMOV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum XMOV.DE drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAA.DE and XMOV.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAA.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-34.78%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-10.87%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.05%

-7.05%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-7.67%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.00%

+0.91%

Volatility

AIAA.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) is 4.53%, while Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that AIAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMOV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIAA.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

7.76%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

14.26%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

21.46%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

18.88%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

20.57%

-2.83%