AHYMX vs. NMHIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AHYMX (abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund) and NMHIX (Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 10 years, AHYMX returned 1.56%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for NMHIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHYMX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NMHIX.

Performance

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYMX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than NMHIX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AHYMX has underperformed NMHIX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while NMHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.

AHYMX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 2.97%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.56%

NMHIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 0.20%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AHYMX abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund	1.18%	2.91%	4.07%	1.56%	-9.36%	4.06%	1.81%	5.23%	1.50%	4.19%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	0.48%	3.56%	6.27%	4.34%	-14.26%	4.90%	4.04%	8.28%	2.19%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYMX and NMHIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016	0.72

The correlation between AHYMX and NMHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AHYMX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYMX

AHYMX Risk / Return Rank: 56
AHYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AHYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AHYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AHYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AHYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

NMHIX

NMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
NMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHYMX	NMHIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.97	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.19	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.48	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.20	+0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	8.22	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the NMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYMX and NMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHYMX	NMHIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.97	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.04	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.48	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.55	+0.42

Drawdowns

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYMX drawdown since its inception was -11.53%, smaller than the maximum NMHIX drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYMX and NMHIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHYMX	NMHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.53%	-19.38%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.98%	-2.62%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.53%	-7.29%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.53%	-19.38%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.53%	-19.38%	+7.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-1.64%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-4.54%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.70%	-0.15%

Volatility

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHYMX	NMHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	1.10%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	2.13%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68%	2.93%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.93%	4.62%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.61%	4.72%	-2.11%

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYMX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

AHYMX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

AHYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than NMHIX's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHYMX abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund	4.56%	4.52%	3.32%	2.21%	2.05%	2.31%	2.74%	3.10%	3.39%	2.82%	3.28%	3.43%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	4.16%	3.98%	3.81%	3.11%	2.43%	2.74%	2.90%	3.36%	3.64%	3.44%	4.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHYMX and NMHIX in my portfolio?

AHYMX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHYMX or NMHIX?

AHYMX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to NMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHYMX dropped -11.53% vs NMHIX's -19.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.