AHYB vs. PSH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AHYB (American Century Select High Yield ETF) and PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. AHYB is passively managed, while PSH is actively managed. Over the past year, AHYB returned 6.50% vs 6.25% for PSH. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

AHYB vs. PSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Select High Yield ETF (AHYB) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYB achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than PSH's 2.02% return.

AHYB

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSH

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.56%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYB vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF	1.31%	8.96%	6.32%	0.22%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	2.02%	7.34%	7.96%	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYB and PSH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023	0.75

The correlation between AHYB and PSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AHYB vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYB

AHYB Risk / Return Rank: 62
AHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
AHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
AHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PSH

PSH Risk / Return Rank: 73
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYB vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Select High Yield ETF (AHYB) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHYB	PSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.08	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.26	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	4.43	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	13.10	-0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHYB vs. PSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the PSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYB and PSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHYB	PSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	2.08	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	2.23	-1.69

Drawdowns

AHYB vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than PSH's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYB and PSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHYB	PSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-3.06%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.41%	-1.42%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.02%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-0.26%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	0.48%	+0.04%

Volatility

AHYB vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison

American Century Select High Yield ETF (AHYB) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) at 0.70%. This indicates that AHYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHYB	PSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	0.70%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	2.10%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	3.01%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.14%	3.26%	+3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.14%	3.26%	+3.88%

AHYB vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AHYB and PSH have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

AHYB vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison

AHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than PSH's 6.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF	6.00%	5.80%	5.87%	5.28%	5.06%	0.60%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	6.66%	6.62%	8.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHYB and PSH in my portfolio?

AHYB and PSH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHYB or PSH?

AHYB has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to PSH (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHYB dropped -14.76% vs PSH's -3.06%.

Which ETF is better, AHYB or PSH?

On 1-year performance, AHYB leads with 6.50% vs 6.25% for PSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, PSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AHYB or PSH?

Over the 1-year period, AHYB has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AHYB or PSH?

AHYB and PSH have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AHYB or PSH?

PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 6.00% for AHYB.

What is the main difference between AHYB and PSH?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and PGIM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.