AHYB vs. NHYB
AHYB (American Century Select High Yield ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - AHYB tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (BB) while NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AHYB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
AHYB vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHYB achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than NHYB's 1.96% return.
AHYB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHYB vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF | 1.44% | 1.57% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHYB and NHYB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHYB vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
AHYB
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AHYB vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Select High Yield ETF (AHYB) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AHYB | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AHYB vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHYB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYB and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHYB | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -2.40% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.15% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -0.36% | -3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility
AHYB vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHYB | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 3.62% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 3.62% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 3.62% | +3.49% |
AHYB vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHYB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHYB vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
AHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than NHYB's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF | 5.99% | 5.80% | 5.87% | 5.28% | 5.06% | 0.60% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHYB and NHYB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AHYB.
AHYB has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
AHYB tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (BB), while NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AHYB and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for AHYB and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer