PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AHYA.DE is traded in USD, while EUN3.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUN3.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYA.DE achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than EUN3.DE's -2.80% return.


AHYA.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
10Y*

EUN3.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-2.80%
6M
-2.64%
1Y
-1.66%
3Y*
0.88%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
-0.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYA.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD
-0.05%3.73%1.27%5.70%-2.53%
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-2.80%6.83%-3.59%3.62%-2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

0.76

The correlation between AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYA.DE
AHYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AHYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN3.DE
EUN3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYA.DEEUN3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.96

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.33

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

-0.76

+2.72

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYA.DEEUN3.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

-0.26

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.00

+0.43

Drawdowns

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum EUN3.DE drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYA.DEEUN3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-28.01%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-5.01%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.86%

-7.79%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-20.47%

+18.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-9.92%

+7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.19%

-1.15%

Volatility

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) is 1.41%, while iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that AHYA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUN3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYA.DEEUN3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.86%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

4.56%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

6.38%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.67%

7.74%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

6.97%

-2.30%

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYA.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EUN3.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AHYA.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Dividend Comparison

AHYA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUN3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYA.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.50%3.09%2.40%1.47%0.79%0.60%1.08%1.20%1.04%1.01%1.04%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUN3.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUN3.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AHYA.DE.

AHYA.DE tracks JP Morgan Government Bond Global (USD Hedged), while EUN3.DE tracks FTSE G7 Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AHYA.DE and 0.20% for EUN3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYA.DE and EUN3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer