PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGTHX vs. RFNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGTHX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than RFNGX's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AGTHX has outperformed RFNGX with an annualized return of 15.88%, while RFNGX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.08% annualized return.


AGTHX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.21%
YTD
9.21%
6M
8.74%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
15.88%

RFNGX

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.47%
6M
15.51%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
26.06%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.21%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
14.47%24.58%22.77%26.25%-16.38%22.83%13.72%27.48%-7.09%23.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AGTHX and RFNGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.96

The correlation between AGTHX and RFNGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGTHX vs. RFNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

RFNGX
RFNGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RFNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RFNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGTHXRFNGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.21

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

14.91

-7.74

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGTHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the RFNGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGTHX and RFNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGTHXRFNGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.48

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.89

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.80

-0.09

Drawdowns

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGTHX drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than RFNGX's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGTHX and RFNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGTHXRFNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-33.90%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-10.62%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-17.92%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.38%

-24.88%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

-33.90%

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.70%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.02%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.29%

+1.23%

Volatility

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGTHXRFNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.81%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

10.79%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

13.76%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

16.81%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

17.73%

+1.96%

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGTHX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RFNGX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGTHX vs. RFNGX - Dividend Comparison

AGTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than RFNGX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.79%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
7.73%8.82%8.91%6.10%5.33%11.29%1.77%7.21%10.67%7.56%5.01%6.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AGTHX and RFNGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AGTHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to RFNGX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGTHX dropped -51.91% vs RFNGX's -33.90%.

RFNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGTHX and RFNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer