PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGRO vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGRO vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRO achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRO has underperformed TIP with an annualized return of 0.95%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.


AGRO

1D
3.10%
1M
-11.80%
6M
24.56%
YTD
31.16%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
0.95%

TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRO vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
31.16%-12.37%-12.39%38.60%11.50%12.94%-18.76%20.26%-32.69%-0.39%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.00%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRO and TIP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.01

The correlation between AGRO and TIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGRO vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRO
AGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRO vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGROTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.59

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

4.58

-3.54

AGRO vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRO and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGRO vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRO drawdown since its inception was -73.70%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRO and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGROTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.70%

-14.57%

-59.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.99%

-1.98%

-38.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.99%

-4.54%

-35.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.34%

-14.51%

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.07%

-14.51%

-57.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.08%

-0.85%

-31.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-3.42%

-28.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.75%

0.69%

+15.06%

Volatility

AGRO vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) has a higher volatility of 16.23% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.25%. This indicates that AGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGROTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.23%

1.25%

+14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.67%

2.54%

+38.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.55%

3.47%

+45.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.03%

6.20%

+35.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

5.73%

+34.24%

Dividends

AGRO vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

AGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than TIP's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
2.87%4.41%3.63%2.95%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
4.44%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGRO and TIP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRO has higher volatility (16.23%) compared to TIP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRO dropped -73.70% vs TIP's -14.57%.

TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGRO and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer