PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGNG vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGNG vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -10.17% return.


AGNG

1D
0.76%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
9.60%

SHLD

1D
-1.15%
1M
-11.99%
YTD
-10.17%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
-0.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNG vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
-0.55%20.01%7.03%5.08%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-10.17%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNG and SHLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.34

AGNG vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGNG
SHLD

Healthcare

91.2%

-

Real Estate

8.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

87.8%

Technology

-

12.2%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

AGNG
91.2%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

AGNG
8.9%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Communication Services

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Energy

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Industrials

AGNG

-

SHLD
87.8%

Technology

AGNG

-

SHLD
12.2%

Utilities

AGNG

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGNG vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNG
AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNG vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGNGSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

-0.01

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

-0.03

+2.93

AGNG vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNG and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGNG vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGNGSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-25.40%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-25.40%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-25.40%

+18.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-3.55%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

8.97%

-4.24%

Volatility

AGNG vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is 4.49%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that AGNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGNGSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

9.01%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

20.22%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

24.85%

-11.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

21.39%

-6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

21.39%

-4.25%

AGNG vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGNG and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

AGNG vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SHLD's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
0.88%0.88%0.83%0.96%0.49%0.72%0.36%0.83%1.00%1.04%0.45%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.61%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNG and SHLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to AGNG (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNG dropped -30.58% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, AGNG leads with 13.70% vs -0.23% for SHLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 13.70% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGNG and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.61% for SHLD.

AGNG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index.

AGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGNG and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer