PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGNG vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGNG vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 33.84% return.


AGNG

1D
2.07%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-2.82%
6M
-3.18%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
8.91%

AIQ

1D
-1.58%
1M
16.50%
YTD
33.84%
6M
33.72%
1Y
64.95%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNG vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
-2.82%20.01%7.03%9.65%-8.61%3.91%18.96%25.24%-4.72%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
33.84%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNG and AIQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between AGNG and AIQ has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AGNG vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGNG
AIQ

Healthcare

90.8%
0.4%

Real Estate

9.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

4.2%

Technology

-

73.3%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

AGNG
90.8%
AIQ
0.4%

Real Estate

AGNG
9.2%
AIQ

-

Basic Materials

AGNG

-

AIQ

-

Communication Services

AGNG

-

AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AGNG

-

AIQ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

AGNG

-

AIQ

-

Energy

AGNG

-

AIQ

-

Financial Services

AGNG

-

AIQ
0.4%

Industrials

AGNG

-

AIQ
4.2%

Technology

AGNG

-

AIQ
73.3%

Utilities

AGNG

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGNG vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNG
AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNG vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGNGAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.96

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

13.69

-10.99

AGNG vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNG and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGNGAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.83

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.74

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Drawdowns

AGNG vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGNGAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-44.66%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-16.47%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-26.35%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-44.66%

+19.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.25%

-2.95%

-6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-9.79%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

4.76%

-0.52%

Volatility

AGNG vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is 4.43%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that AGNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGNGAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

8.82%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

18.55%

-8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.77%

23.11%

-9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

25.34%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

25.50%

-8.36%

AGNG vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGNG vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
0.90%0.88%0.83%0.96%0.49%0.72%0.36%0.83%1.00%1.04%0.45%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNG and AIQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to AGNG (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNG dropped -30.58% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 18.69% vs 4.39% for AGNG. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

AGNG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AGNG and 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGNG and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer