AGNCM vs. JPST
AGNCM (AGNC Investment Corp.) is a stock, while JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 5 years, AGNCM returned 7.92%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for JPST. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGNCM vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNCM achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.
AGNCM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 11.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
AGNCM vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNCM AGNC Investment Corp. | 4.61% | 5.19% | 18.72% | 27.86% | -16.44% | 10.76% | 4.22% | 9.97% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.40% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNCM and JPST is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGNCM vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
AGNCM
JPST
AGNCM vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCM) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 3.94 | -2.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 29.16 | -25.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 144.13 | -132.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 8.09 | -6.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 6.32 | -5.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 3.20 | -2.89 |
Drawdowns
AGNCM vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNCM drawdown since its inception was -55.99%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNCM and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.99% | -3.28% | -52.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -0.15% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -0.30% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.38% | -0.79% | -27.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.02% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -0.08% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.03% | +0.95% |
Volatility
AGNCM vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCM) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that AGNCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGNCM | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.15% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.42% | 0.36% | +4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.94% | 0.54% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 0.58% | +12.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 0.93% | +25.61% |
Dividends
AGNCM vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
AGNCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNCM AGNC Investment Corp. | 8.72% | 9.09% | 8.94% | 7.31% | 8.66% | 6.67% | 6.91% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGNCM and JPST have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGNCM has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNCM dropped -55.99% vs JPST's -3.28%.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGNCM and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer