PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGNC vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGNC vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNC achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 11.35% return.


AGNC

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.20%
6M
-0.95%
YTD
7.24%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
6.26%
ALL TIME*
11.51%

FFUT

1D
-1.03%
1M
3.39%
6M
8.23%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$254.42M$219.78M$180.51M
$3.34M$3.91M$2.05M

AGNC vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
7.24%29.09%
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
11.35%8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNC and FFUT is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGNC vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGNC vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGNCFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.79

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

12.78

-8.85

AGNC vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNC and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGNC vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNC drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNC and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGNCFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.56%

-5.59%

-48.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-5.59%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-3.37%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-1.13%

-12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

1.65%

+5.14%

Volatility

AGNC vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) at 3.91%. This indicates that AGNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGNCFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

3.91%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

9.31%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

11.69%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

11.14%

+14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

11.14%

+14.36%

Dividends

AGNC vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

AGNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.53%, more than FFUT's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.53%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNC and FFUT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNC has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to FFUT (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNC dropped -54.56% vs FFUT's -5.59%.

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGNC and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer