PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGMI vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
7.92%176.11%-0.74%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
6.07%68.33%13.84%
Different Trading Currencies

AGMI is traded in USD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 6.07% return.


AGMI

1D
-0.84%
1M
-13.46%
YTD
7.92%
6M
35.39%
1Y
140.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PPFB.DE

1D
-2.22%
1M
-9.05%
YTD
6.07%
6M
21.55%
1Y
49.11%
3Y*
32.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGMIPPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

1.88

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.37

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.91

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.37

11.03

+4.33

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and PPFB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGMIPPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

1.88

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

1.26

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and PPFB.DE is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
4.10%4.43%1.81%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and PPFB.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGMIPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-16.60%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.26%

-16.60%

-16.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.12%

-10.65%

-11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-4.12%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

4.41%

+4.89%

Volatility

AGMI vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 10.90%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGMIPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.45%

10.90%

+7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.29%

21.77%

+20.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.20%

25.94%

+22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.45%

17.30%

+26.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.45%

17.30%

+26.15%