AGIQ vs. NBET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) and NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while NBET is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. AGIQ is passively managed, while NBET is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. AGIQ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NBET.

Performance

AGIQ vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than NBET's 24.75% return.

AGIQ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 11.12%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 8.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBET

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 24.75%
• 6M: 21.35%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGIQ vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	10.78%	14.42%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	24.75%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AGIQ and NBET is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	-0.05

AGIQ vs. NBET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGIQ	NBET
Technology	56.0%	-
Industrials	14.9%	2.6%
Healthcare	13.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	89.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	8.4%

Return for Risk

AGIQ vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 65
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGIQ vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGIQ	NBET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	0.73	+0.88

Drawdowns

AGIQ vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than NBET's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and NBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGIQ	NBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-18.72%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-3.94%	+2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-5.06%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGIQ	NBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	14.59%	+8.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	19.54%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.17%	19.54%	+3.63%

AGIQ vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGIQ vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than NBET's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	2.33%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGIQ and NBET in my portfolio?

AGIQ and NBET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGIQ or NBET?

On fees, NBET is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGIQ or NBET?

NBET is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGIQ or NBET?

NBET has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.34% for AGIQ.

What is the main difference between AGIQ and NBET?

AGIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while NBET is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 0.65% for NBET.