AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) and PRIG.L (Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Global Bonds funds from Amundi - AGHG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP while PRIG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGHG.L returned 3.65%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for PRIG.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGHG.L charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIG.L.

Performance

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGHG.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than PRIG.L's -0.87% return.

AGHG.L

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRIG.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -1.26%
• 1Y: 1.57%
• 3Y*: -0.72%
• 5Y*: -2.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)	0.55%	4.58%	2.41%	5.75%	-4.49%
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	-0.87%	-0.19%	-1.79%	-1.09%	-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and PRIG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022	0.47

The correlation between AGHG.L and PRIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGHG.L	PRIG.L
Real Estate	18.0%	-
Healthcare	16.6%	7.7%
Financial Services	13.6%	2.6%
Industrials	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	-
Utilities	10.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	-
Communication Services	8.4%	3.5%
Technology	2.0%	86.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L

AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PRIG.L

PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGHG.L	PRIG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.26	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	0.42	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.05	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	0.28	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	0.54	+3.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGHG.L and PRIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGHG.L	PRIG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	0.26	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	-0.12	+0.62

Drawdowns

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGHG.L drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum PRIG.L drawdown of -26.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGHG.L and PRIG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGHG.L	PRIG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-26.02%	+19.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	-4.46%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.02%	-5.35%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-23.84%	+22.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-16.42%	+14.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	2.32%	-1.54%

Volatility

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGHG.L	PRIG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	1.26%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	3.50%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	4.85%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.96%	7.13%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	7.75%	-2.79%

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGHG.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIG.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AGHG.L vs. PRIG.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, which matches PRIG.L's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)	2.97%	2.98%	2.78%	2.54%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	2.98%	2.96%	2.31%	1.97%	1.72%	1.50%	1.75%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGHG.L and PRIG.L in my portfolio?

AGHG.L and PRIG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGHG.L or PRIG.L?

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGHG.L or PRIG.L?

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for AGHG.L.

What is the main difference between AGHG.L and PRIG.L?

AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for AGHG.L and 0.05% for PRIG.L.