PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGHG.L is traded in GBp, while IGLO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGHG.L achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than IGLO.L's -1.22% return.


AGHG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
10Y*

IGLO.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-1.22%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
-1.11%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*
-0.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
0.25%4.32%2.99%5.41%-11.93%-0.37%
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
-1.22%-0.49%-1.96%-1.20%-7.90%-0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and IGLO.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.50

The correlation between AGHG.L and IGLO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLO.L
IGLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGHG.LIGLO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.20

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

0.39

+3.54

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGHG.L and IGLO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGHG.LIGLO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.16

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.07

-0.09

Drawdowns

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGHG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum IGLO.L drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGHG.L and IGLO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGHG.LIGLO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-25.42%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-5.07%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-5.77%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-23.91%

+21.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-11.01%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.61%

-1.83%

Volatility

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) is 1.19%, while iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that AGHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGHG.LIGLO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.91%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

5.14%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

6.29%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

8.31%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

9.56%

-5.42%

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGHG.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLO.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGHG.L vs. IGLO.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than IGLO.L's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.98%2.98%2.77%2.55%2.18%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
3.11%2.86%2.51%1.47%0.78%0.63%0.99%1.21%1.07%0.93%1.09%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGHG.L and IGLO.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGLO.L.

AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while IGLO.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for AGHG.L and 0.20% for IGLO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGHG.L and IGLO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer