PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGHG.L is traded in GBp, while GAAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GAAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AGHG.L having a 0.55% return and GAAA.L slightly lower at 0.53%.


AGHG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
10Y*

GAAA.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.53%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
1.34%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
0.55%4.58%2.41%5.75%-4.49%
GAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.50%2.56%-3.42%2.85%-6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and GAAA.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022

0.50

The correlation between AGHG.L and GAAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GAAA.L
GAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGHG.LGAAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.80

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

1.60

+2.63

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the GAAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGHG.L and GAAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGHG.LGAAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.48

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.09

+0.59

Drawdowns

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGHG.L drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum GAAA.L drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGHG.L and GAAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGHG.LGAAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-24.49%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-3.62%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-5.86%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-18.20%

+17.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-12.61%

+10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.80%

-1.02%

Volatility

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) is 1.23%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that AGHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGHG.LGAAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.22%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

5.00%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

5.97%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

7.86%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

7.94%

-2.98%

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGHG.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGHG.L vs. GAAA.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while GAAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.97%2.98%2.78%2.54%2.18%
GAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGHG.L and GAAA.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GAAA.L.

AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while GAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for AGHG.L and 0.20% for GAAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGHG.L and GAAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer