PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGHG.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGHG.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGHG.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.86% return.


AGHG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
10Y*

500U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.60%
YTD
10.86%
6M
10.07%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
16.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
0.55%4.58%2.41%5.75%-4.49%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.82%9.90%26.63%20.51%-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and 500U.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022

0.06

The correlation between AGHG.L and 500U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGHG.L
500U.L

Real Estate

18.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

16.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

13.6%
11.8%

Industrials

10.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.1%

Utilities

10.4%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
4.9%

Communication Services

8.4%
11.2%

Technology

2.0%
35.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Real Estate

AGHG.L
18.0%
500U.L
1.9%

Healthcare

AGHG.L
16.6%
500U.L
8.5%

Financial Services

AGHG.L
13.6%
500U.L
11.8%

Industrials

AGHG.L
10.9%
500U.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AGHG.L
10.8%
500U.L
10.1%

Utilities

AGHG.L
10.4%
500U.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

AGHG.L
9.4%
500U.L
4.9%

Communication Services

AGHG.L
8.4%
500U.L
11.2%

Technology

AGHG.L
2.0%
500U.L
35.6%

Basic Materials

AGHG.L

-

500U.L
1.8%

Energy

AGHG.L

-

500U.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGHG.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.04

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

13.58

-9.35

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGHG.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGHG.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.46

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.33

-0.83

Drawdowns

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGHG.L drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGHG.L and 500U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGHG.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-26.14%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-7.19%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-20.95%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.15%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-3.62%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.15%

-1.37%

Volatility

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) is 1.23%, while Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that AGHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGHG.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.50%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

8.63%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

11.84%

-8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

15.26%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

18.56%

-13.60%

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGHG.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGHG.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while 500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.97%2.98%2.78%2.54%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGHG.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

AGHG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while 500U.L is S&P 500. AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for AGHG.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGHG.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer