PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGES.L is traded in GBp, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGES.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.12% return.


AGES.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.19%
6M
1.82%
1Y
17.26%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*

MWOZ.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.36%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.57%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AGES.L
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF
0.19%9.66%
MWOZ.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
10.12%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AGES.L and MWOZ.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.75

The correlation between AGES.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGES.L
AGES.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AGES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AGES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOZ.L
MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGES.LMWOZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.16

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

16.82

-8.18

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGES.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGES.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGES.LMWOZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.68

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.04

-0.58

Drawdowns

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGES.L drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGES.L and MWOZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGES.LMWOZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-18.50%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.63%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-0.20%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-3.17%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.64%

+0.35%

Volatility

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 2.53%. This indicates that AGES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGES.LMWOZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.53%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

7.28%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

10.32%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

13.93%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

13.93%

+1.56%

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGES.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGES.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

AGES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.


PositionTTM2025
AGES.L
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%
MWOZ.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
1.20%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGES.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AGES.L.

AGES.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AGES.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGES.L and MWOZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer