AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L
AGED.L (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - AGED.L tracks the Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index while MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AGED.L returned 25.89% vs 22.34% for MWOZ.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGED.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MWOZ.L.
Performance
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGED.L is traded in USD, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGED.L achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than MWOZ.L's 10.18% return.
AGED.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGED.L iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.02% | 20.08% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.18% | 17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGED.L and MWOZ.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AGED.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGED.L
MWOZ.L
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGED.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.55 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 10.83 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGED.L drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGED.L and MWOZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGED.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.12% | -17.73% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -8.81% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.23% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -2.00% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.07% | +0.24% |
Volatility
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 3.05%. This indicates that AGED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGED.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.05% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 9.24% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.99% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.10% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 15.10% | +2.64% |
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGED.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGED.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison
AGED.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AGED.L iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.19% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGED.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AGED.L.
AGED.L tracks Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AGED.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.
Find the right allocation for AGED.L and MWOZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer