PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFVLX vs. YACKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFVLX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 19.98% return.


AFVLX

1D
0.50%
1M
6.33%
YTD
11.52%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*

YACKX

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.67%
YTD
19.98%
6M
5.18%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
11.52%13.12%7.06%19.43%-10.88%27.73%15.33%12.42%
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
19.98%1.34%13.15%15.46%-7.50%19.66%15.25%17.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AFVLX and YACKX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between AFVLX and YACKX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFVLX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFVLX
AFVLX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AFVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

YACKX
YACKX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
YACKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YACKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
YACKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YACKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YACKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFVLXYACKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.03

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

2.99

+8.78

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the YACKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFVLX and YACKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFVLXYACKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.86

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.53

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.71

-0.03

Drawdowns

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFVLX drawdown since its inception was -36.29%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFVLX and YACKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFVLXYACKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.29%

-46.65%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-16.30%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-18.30%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-19.86%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-5.27%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

5.57%

-3.34%

Volatility

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) is 3.03%, while AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that AFVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFVLXYACKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

4.31%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

19.61%

-10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

19.37%

-7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

17.10%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

16.15%

+4.11%

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFVLX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFVLX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison

AFVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
3.35%3.74%3.80%1.18%1.02%2.11%1.09%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
0.00%0.00%17.32%4.39%7.35%3.72%10.82%16.84%23.06%10.67%8.57%13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFVLX and YACKX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YACKX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to AFVLX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFVLX dropped -36.29% vs YACKX's -46.65%.

AFVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFVLX and YACKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer