AFSC vs. OSCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFSC (abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AFSC returned 27.01% vs 13.62% for OSCV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFSC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OSCV.

Performance

AFSC vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSC achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 8.34% return.

AFSC

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 16.58%
• 6M: 13.48%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OSCV

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 13.62%
• 3Y*: 10.05%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFSC vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	16.58%	2.67%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	8.34%	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AFSC and OSCV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.83

The correlation between AFSC and OSCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFSC vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSC

AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 47
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 31
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSC vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFSC	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.03	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.61	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.81	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.96	5.34	+4.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFSC vs. OSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the OSCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSC and OSCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFSC	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.03	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.36	+0.31

Drawdowns

AFSC vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSC drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, smaller than the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSC and OSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFSC	OSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.68%	-42.40%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-7.55%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-3.46%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-7.60%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.55%	+0.17%

Volatility

AFSC vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) at 3.47%. This indicates that AFSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFSC	OSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	3.47%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.99%	9.45%	+4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.59%	13.37%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.57%	17.26%	+5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	20.91%	+1.66%

AFSC vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFSC vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison

AFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than OSCV's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.11%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFSC and OSCV in my portfolio?

AFSC and OSCV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFSC or OSCV?

AFSC has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to OSCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSC dropped -21.68% vs OSCV's -42.40%.

Which ETF is better, AFSC or OSCV?

On 1-year performance, AFSC leads with 27.01% vs 13.62% for OSCV. On fees, AFSC is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFSC or OSCV?

Over the 1-year period, AFSC has performed better with a 27.01% return vs 13.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFSC or OSCV?

AFSC is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFSC or OSCV?

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.07% for AFSC.

What is the main difference between AFSC and OSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFSC and 0.79% for OSCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.