PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFSC vs. FDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFSC vs. FDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AFSC vs. FDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSC achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FDM's 3.39% return.


AFSC

1D
3.06%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
0.79%
6M
2.45%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDM

1D
1.32%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
3.39%
6M
9.17%
1Y
33.86%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFSC vs. FDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDM's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AFSC vs. FDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSC
AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSC vs. FDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFSCFDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

1.53

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

2.22

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.78

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.61

9.61

-4.00

AFSC vs. FDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSC and FDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFSCFDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.53

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.34

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AFSC and FDM is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AFSC vs. FDM - Dividend Comparison

AFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FDM's 1.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFSC
abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF
0.08%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.33%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%

Drawdowns

AFSC vs. FDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSC drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, smaller than the maximum FDM drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSC and FDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AFSCFDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-63.45%

+41.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-11.99%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

-5.74%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-11.43%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.46%

-0.14%

Volatility

AFSC vs. FDM - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) at 6.37%. This indicates that AFSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AFSCFDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

6.37%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

14.17%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

22.29%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

21.53%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

23.33%

-0.35%