AFSC vs. BCIM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM).

AFSC and BCIM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFSC is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004. BCIM is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Industrial Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2021.

Performance

AFSC vs. BCIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AFSC vs. BCIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.79%	2.67%
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	0.00%	4.65%

Returns By Period

AFSC

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 14.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCIM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFSC vs. BCIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BCIM's 0.41% expense ratio.

AFSC

abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF

BCIM

abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF

Return for Risk

AFSC vs. BCIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSC

AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 41
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSC vs. BCIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFSC	BCIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFSC	BCIM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between AFSC and BCIM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AFSC vs. BCIM - Dividend Comparison

AFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than BCIM's 3.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.08%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	3.77%	3.77%	11.47%	3.36%	0.72%	1.57%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFSC	BCIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.54%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFSC	BCIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.82%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.98%	—	—