AFOCX vs. TANDX
AFOCX (Archer Focus Fund) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AFOCX returned 9.89%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for TANDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFOCX charges 3.29%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.
Performance
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFOCX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.98% return.
AFOCX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
TANDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- -13.98%
- 6M
- -14.52%
- 1Y
- -15.47%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund | 10.35% | 0.73% | 29.35% | 14.14% | -9.32% | 19.98% | 10.13% | 0.00% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -13.98% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 13.39% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFOCX and TANDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AFOCX and TANDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFOCX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
AFOCX
TANDX
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFOCX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.77 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.88 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | -1.91 | +8.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFOCX drawdown since its inception was -91.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOCX and TANDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFOCX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.26% | -93.98% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -16.90% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.26% | -93.98% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.26% | -93.98% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.69% | -93.98% | +5.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -20.77% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 7.72% | -5.25% |
Volatility
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 3.23%. This indicates that AFOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFOCX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.23% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 7.55% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 9.62% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 385.85% | 596.04% | -210.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 339.29% | 494.77% | -155.48% |
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFOCX has a 3.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFOCX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
AFOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TANDX's 7.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund | 2.48% | 2.63% | 22.61% | 1.65% | 6.64% | 9.74% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 7.17% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFOCX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFOCX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to TANDX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFOCX dropped -91.26% vs TANDX's -93.98%.
AFOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFOCX and TANDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer