PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFMFX vs. RIDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMFX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than RIDAX's 5.99% return.


AFMFX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.98%
YTD
6.78%
6M
7.02%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*

RIDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.89%
YTD
5.99%
6M
6.96%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
7.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFMFX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3
6.78%16.43%15.30%9.77%-4.19%23.64%5.04%21.90%-1.98%11.75%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
5.99%16.83%9.49%6.16%-7.14%16.47%3.68%17.57%-6.06%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMFX and RIDAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.93

The correlation between AFMFX and RIDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFMFX vs. RIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMFX
AFMFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AFMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RIDAX
RIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFMFXRIDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.47

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

9.14

+0.13

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the RIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMFX and RIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFMFXRIDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.12

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.73

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.68

+0.08

Drawdowns

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMFX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum RIDAX drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMFX and RIDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFMFXRIDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.79%

-42.37%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-6.13%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-8.71%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.16%

-16.28%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-4.40%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.65%

+0.31%

Volatility

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX) at 2.03%. This indicates that AFMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFMFXRIDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.03%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

5.61%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

7.13%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

9.48%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

10.69%

+3.81%

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMFX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RIDAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFMFX vs. RIDAX - Dividend Comparison

AFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, less than RIDAX's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFMFX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3
7.40%7.86%6.60%4.06%5.20%3.58%2.22%4.89%6.75%6.25%0.00%0.00%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
8.74%9.24%5.14%2.38%6.20%5.92%2.09%4.25%6.58%3.68%2.32%4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFMFX and RIDAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFMFX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to RIDAX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMFX dropped -29.79% vs RIDAX's -42.37%.

RIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMFX and RIDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer