PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFMCX vs. HDPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) and Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMCX achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than HDPSX's 29.53% return. Over the past 10 years, AFMCX has underperformed HDPSX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while HDPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


AFMCX

1D
0.77%
1M
4.96%
YTD
20.96%
6M
25.53%
1Y
54.01%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
11.38%

HDPSX

1D
0.42%
1M
5.80%
YTD
29.53%
6M
28.59%
1Y
51.98%
3Y*
33.72%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFMCX
Acuitas US Microcap Fund
20.96%13.54%8.32%17.41%-19.11%29.20%14.07%21.89%-13.26%10.32%
HDPSX
Hodges Small Cap Fund
29.53%3.07%62.98%14.88%-12.78%35.60%16.98%16.85%-16.35%9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMCX and HDPSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.89

The correlation between AFMCX and HDPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFMCX vs. HDPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMCX
AFMCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AFMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HDPSX
HDPSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HDPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) and Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFMCXHDPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.53

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.37

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

4.95

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.79

15.01

+0.77

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the HDPSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMCX and HDPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFMCXHDPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.61

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.44

+0.01

Drawdowns

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMCX drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, smaller than the maximum HDPSX drawdown of -65.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMCX and HDPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFMCXHDPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.65%

-65.86%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-10.42%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.09%

-28.83%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.09%

-28.83%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.65%

-58.96%

+7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-10.85%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.43%

-0.07%

Volatility

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) is 5.24%, while Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that AFMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFMCXHDPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.38%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

14.90%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.13%

21.01%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

27.00%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

27.50%

-3.55%

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMCX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HDPSX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFMCX vs. HDPSX - Dividend Comparison

AFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than HDPSX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFMCX
Acuitas US Microcap Fund
3.92%4.74%3.18%0.00%6.40%8.34%0.00%0.10%28.38%3.58%0.92%6.58%
HDPSX
Hodges Small Cap Fund
5.90%7.64%44.97%5.01%6.46%19.53%0.00%8.25%4.66%14.53%0.32%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFMCX and HDPSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDPSX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to AFMCX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMCX dropped -51.65% vs HDPSX's -65.86%.

AFMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMCX and HDPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer