PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFMCX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMCX achieves a 25.62% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 6.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AFMCX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.


AFMCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
7.17%
YTD
25.62%
6M
22.88%
1Y
49.00%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
12.01%

DFISX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
6.01%
6M
5.68%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFMCX
Acuitas US Microcap Fund
25.62%13.54%8.32%17.41%-19.11%29.20%14.07%21.89%-13.26%10.32%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
6.01%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMCX and DFISX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.65

The correlation between AFMCX and DFISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFMCX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMCX
AFMCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AFMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFMCXDFISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

1.84

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

6.59

+8.79

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMCX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMCX drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMCX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFMCXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.65%

-60.66%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-11.96%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.09%

-13.68%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.09%

-35.06%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.65%

-43.00%

-8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-4.59%

+3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-11.63%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.32%

+0.04%

Volatility

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

Acuitas US Microcap Fund (AFMCX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 4.78%. This indicates that AFMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFMCXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

4.78%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

11.72%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

14.23%

+7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

15.96%

+7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.99%

16.01%

+7.98%

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMCX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFMCX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

AFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than DFISX's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFMCX
Acuitas US Microcap Fund
3.77%4.74%3.18%0.00%6.40%8.34%0.00%0.10%28.38%3.58%0.92%6.58%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.97%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFMCX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFMCX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to DFISX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMCX dropped -51.65% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

AFMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMCX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer