PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFLIX vs. JUCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) and Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund (JUCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFLIX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than JUCIX's 1.18% return.


AFLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.65%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*

JUCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFLIX
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund
1.42%5.99%5.51%7.75%-5.69%1.66%0.58%1.56%1.70%1.85%
JUCIX
Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund
1.18%6.68%6.13%7.02%-1.46%-0.43%3.56%2.60%-3.85%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AFLIX and JUCIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.25

Over the past year, AFLIX and JUCIX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFLIX vs. JUCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFLIX
AFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JUCIX
JUCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JUCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JUCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) and Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund (JUCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFLIXJUCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.95

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.24

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.82

16.82

+1.00

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFLIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the JUCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLIX and JUCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLIX drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than JUCIX's maximum drawdown of -8.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLIX and JUCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFLIXJUCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-8.25%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-1.32%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.38%

-1.32%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.55%

-3.81%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.22%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.33%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.33%

-0.05%

Volatility

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) is 0.38%, while Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund (JUCIX) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that AFLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFLIXJUCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.59%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

1.51%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

2.25%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

1.86%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.33%

2.51%

-0.18%

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JUCIX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFLIX vs. JUCIX - Dividend Comparison

AFLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than JUCIX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFLIX
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund
2.30%3.15%5.97%5.31%4.13%2.40%4.51%2.88%2.92%1.34%0.00%0.00%
JUCIX
Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund
4.88%4.86%4.66%3.73%2.09%1.48%1.70%2.68%3.24%2.56%4.76%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFLIX and JUCIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JUCIX has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to AFLIX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLIX dropped -9.43% vs JUCIX's -8.25%.

AFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFLIX and JUCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer